Est. 2010 · Rebuilt 2026

We exist because identity protection is genuinely confusing

Too many services. Too much marketing language. Too little honest comparison. This site started in 2010 to fix that, and the 2026 rebuild carries the same goal forward.

2010
Year founded
7
Services compared
Q
Quarterly reviews
0
Paid placements

Why this site exists

IdentityTheftComparisons.com started in 2010 when its founder, a Palmdale, California resident, noticed a problem: identity theft protection was becoming a significant consumer category, but the available information was either produced by the companies themselves or too technical for most people to act on.

The original site recommended just two services: LifeLock and TrustedID. The premise was simple: compare what actually matters, explain it plainly, and let readers decide for themselves.

The premise hasn't changed. The market has. Two services became seven on our comparison table today. Basic credit monitoring grew into dark web scanning, scam and cyber extortion coverage, and investigator-led recovery.

In 2026 we rebuilt everything from scratch, with a new design, a new scoring methodology, and fresh research on every service we cover, so the information here keeps pace with the threats people actually face.

The original pitch · 2010
"There are so many different services out there that all claim to protect you and your identity. How can someone choose the best one?"
That was the opening line of the very first article on this site. Sixteen years later, it's still the right question, and it's harder to answer than ever.
$20.9B
Cybercrime losses reported to the FBI in 2025. Source: IC3

Who runs this site

Ben, editor of IdentityTheftComparisons.com

Ben, editor

Ben runs IdentityTheftComparisons.com and leads its research and reviews. He checks each service's plans, pricing, and insurance terms against the provider's own documentation and independent sources, and re-verifies every page each quarter.

Every review on this site is written and fact-checked by Ben using the methodology below. Spotted something out of date? Let him know.

Our mission

Help ordinary people make confident, informed decisions about identity theft protection, without wading through marketing language, confusing plan tiers, or fine print designed to obscure rather than inform.

Honest comparisons

We compare every service on the same criteria and publish weaknesses alongside strengths, whether or not an affiliate relationship exists. If a service's price jumps at renewal, we say so prominently.

Plain English

Three-bureau credit monitoring, dark web scanning, insurance pools: we explain what these things actually mean and why they matter, so you can decide based on your real needs.

Current information

Providers change pricing, features, and insurance terms often. We re-check every service at least once per quarter and update our pages to reflect what's true today.

How we review services

Every service on this site is evaluated with the same methodology. No company can pay to change its score, improve its position, or remove unfavorable information from its review.

1

Independent research

We research each service from official pricing pages, plan and policy documents, and reputable third-party reviews. We don't publish company-supplied claims without checking them against other sources.

2

Feature verification by plan

We check which features are included at each plan tier. When a feature requires a higher tier, we name that plan instead of implying it comes with the starting price.

3

Price verification

We check introductory and renewal pricing. Several services advertise first-term rates that rise at renewal; we show renewal prices wherever providers publish them and flag it when they don't.

4

Scored across seven categories

Each service is scored in seven weighted categories, and the overall score is a weighted composite, so no single strength can carry a service to the top if it's weak elsewhere.

5

Quarterly update cycle

We revisit every review at least once per quarter, and sooner when a provider makes a material change such as a price increase, plan restructure, or insurance change.

Category 1
20%
Monitoring coverage: bureaus, dark web, SSN, financial accounts
Category 2
18%
Insurance value: coverage limits, what's included
Category 3
17%
Recovery support: who helps you and how much they do
Category 4
15%
Value for money: features per dollar, including renewal pricing
Category 5
13%
Family protection: adults and children covered, child monitoring
Category 6
10%
Cybersecurity tools: VPN, antivirus, password manager
Category 7
7%
Pricing transparency: renewal honesty, fine print, cancellation

Individual reviews show a breakdown tailored to each service's standout strengths and weaknesses; the overall score always uses the weights above.

What we are, and what we are not

We want to be clear about what kind of site this is so you can calibrate how much weight to give our recommendations.

✗

Not owned by any provider

We aren't owned by or employed by any identity theft protection company. We do take part in affiliate programs, which we disclose on every page.

✓

Independently operated

This site is independently owned. Editorial decisions are ours alone, without input from any service provider.

✗

Not a law firm or financial advisor

Nothing on this site is legal or financial advice. Our content is for information and comparison. Consult a qualified professional about your specific situation.

✓

Honest about how we earn money

We earn affiliate commissions and advertising revenue. Our affiliate disclosure explains how that does, and does not, affect our content.

✗

Not a substitute for the fine print

Always confirm current pricing, plan features, and insurance terms with the provider before buying. Prices can change between our updates.

✓

Committed to accuracy

If we get something wrong, we want to know. Email info@identitytheftcomparisons.com and we'll investigate and correct factual errors promptly.

A brief history of this site

2010
Site founded
IdentityTheftComparisons.com launches comparing LifeLock and TrustedID, the two leading services at the time. The mission: plain-English comparisons for regular people, not IT professionals.
2013–2017
A decade of mega-breaches
Major breaches at Target (2013), Home Depot (2014), Anthem (2015), and Equifax (2017) push identity protection into the mainstream and bring many new services to market.
2019–2022
New entrants, new features
Aura emerges as a major competitor. Dark web monitoring, VPN bundles, and AI-assisted monitoring become mainstream features across the category.
2024–2025
Losses keep climbing
Cybercrime losses reported to the FBI rise from $16.6 billion in 2024 to nearly $20.9 billion in 2025. NordProtect enters the market with cyber extortion coverage.
2026
Full site rebuild
Complete redesign and editorial overhaul: a new scoring methodology, in-depth reviews of five leading services, and a seven-service comparison table. LifeLock restructures its lineup into Core, Advanced, and Total plans, and our pages are updated to match.
Ongoing
Quarterly updates
Every service is re-checked at least once per quarter against current provider documentation. Last full verification: September 2026.

We'd love to hear from you

Spotted an error? Have a question we haven't answered? Know of a service we should cover? We read every email and respond personally.

Or write directly to info@identitytheftcomparisons.com